Development Cage Results

This page contains some preliminary results using our noise generation infrastructure on a 32 node develpment cage

Selfish

Selfish is a benchmark that measures the number of cycles of an application lost executing other code. In the graphs below a spike indicates a cycle loss was detected by the benchmark with the quantity of time lost indicated by the amplitude of the spike.

Linux

Linux Laptop

Linux laptop noise Linux laptop noise detail

Linux Service Node

Linux service node noise Linux service node noise detail

Catamount

Un-Modified

Catamount compute node noise w/o my additions

Noise Infrastructure but No Noise

Catamount copute node noise w my additions

10Hz, 0us Noise

 Catamount compute node noise: 10Hz, 0us

10Hz, 10us Noise

 Catamount compute node noise: 10Hz, 10us

10Hz, 100us Noise

 Catamount compute node noise: 10Hz, 100us

10Hz, 1000us Noise

 Catamount compute node noise: 10Hz, 1000us

100Hz, 0us Noise

 Catamount compute node noise: 100Hz, 0us

100Hz, 10us Noise

 Catamount compute node noise: 100Hz, 10us

100Hz, 100us Noise

 Catamount compute node noise: 100Hz, 100us

100Hz, 1000us Noise

 Catamount compute node noise: 100Hz, 1000us

1000Hz, 0us Noise

 Catamount compute node noise: 1000Hz, 0us

1000Hz, 10us Noise

 Catamount compute node noise: 1000Hz, 10us

1000Hz, 100us Noise

 Catamount compute node noise: 1000Hz, 100us

1000Hz, 1000us Noise

In this case we start missing timer interrupts so our efective interrupt frequency is 500Hz, 10000us

 Catamount compute node noise: 1000Hz, 1000us

NAS Parallel Benchmarks

The following graphs show the performance of the NAS Parallel Banchmarks on Catamount/Red Storm.

Increase in Timer Interrupt Frequency Only

The difference in small (< a percent) but seems to be increasing and may be more pronounced at higher node counts

CG

I am rerunning to get the 16 node data as a compiler issue caused a problem in the previous

 NAS CG performance under increased timer interrupt frequency  NAS CG performance under increased timer interrupt frequency

BT

 NAS BT performance under increased timer interrupt frequency

EP

 NAS EP performance under increased timer interrupt frequency  NAS EP performance under increased timer interrupt frequency

FT

 NAS FT performance under increased timer interrupt frequency  NAS FT performance under increased timer interrupt frequency

IS

IS seems to be performing very slightly better at higher interrupt frequencies

 NAS IS performance under increased timer interrupt frequency

LU

 NAS LU performance under increased timer interrupt frequency  NAS LU performance under increased timer interrupt frequency

MG

 NAS MG performance under increased timer interrupt frequency  NAS MG performance under increased timer interrupt frequency

SP

 NAS SP performance under increased timer interrupt frequency

HPLinpack

5 x 5, N = 20000, NB = 160

No Noise
Timer Frequency (Hz.) Gflops
10 66.16
100 66.14
1000 66.03
Noise
Frequency: 10Hz Frequency: 100Hz Frequency: 1000Hz
Delta: 0 us 66.03 GFLOPS 66.03 GFLOPS 66.04 GFLOPS
Delta: 10 us 66.03 GFLOPS 65.88 GFLOPS 65.38 GFLOPS
Delta: 100 us 65.90 GFLOPS 65.30 GFLOPS 59.65 GFLOPS
Delta: 1000 us 63.64 GFLOPS 57.82 GFLOPS 27.95 GFLOPS

HPC Challange

The following are performance numbers of the HPCC benchmark running with my noise infrastructure on RedStorm/Catamount

COMMING SOON

 
/var/www/ssl/data/pages/kurt/os_noise/plots_devcage.txt · Last modified: 2008/01/07 12:37 (external edit)     Back to top